CFB Betting Edge

2024 · Week 9 · Big 12 · backtest — what the model predicted vs what happened, and vs the market
Week 9 backtest · Big 12 · 7 games — what the model predicted vs what happened
Straight up
4–357%
ATS vs close
4–357%
Model margin MAE
7.2
Market margin MAE
7.6
→ model's margins were closer than the market
Results — model read vs the final score + how the closing-line lean held up
Model
pred Kansas State 8.7 · actual Kansas State 2
winner Kansas State
ATS vs close
leaned Kansas +10.0Cover ✓
margin err: model 6.7 · mkt 8.0 · closer
Model
pred Colorado 4.3 · actual Colorado 11
winner Colorado
ATS vs close
leaned Cincinnati +6.0Miss ✗
margin err: model 6.7 · mkt 5.0 · mkt closer
Texas Tech @ TCUFinal 3435
Model
pred Texas Tech 0.4 · actual TCU 1
winner Texas Tech
ATS vs close
leaned Texas Tech +5.0Cover ✓
margin err: model 1.4 · mkt 4.0 · closer
Model
pred West Virginia 0.8 · actual West Virginia 5
winner West Virginia
ATS vs close
leaned West Virginia +5.5Cover ✓
margin err: model 4.2 · mkt 10.5 · closer
Model
pred Oklahoma State 2.4 · actual Baylor 10
winner Oklahoma State
ATS vs close
leaned Oklahoma State +7.0Miss ✗
margin err: model 12.4 · mkt 3.0 · mkt closer
BYU @ UCFFinal 3724
Model
pred BYU 4.2 · actual BYU 13
winner BYU
ATS vs close
leaned BYU +2.5Cover ✓
margin err: model 8.8 · mkt 15.5 · closer
Utah @ HoustonFinal 1417
Model
pred Utah 7.4 · actual Houston 3
winner Utah
ATS vs close
leaned Utah -4.5Miss ✗
margin err: model 10.4 · mkt 7.5 · mkt closer
The model beats SP+ but not the closing line (ATS ≈ break-even). “Model−Mkt” is the gap between our projected home margin and the market's implied margin — a read on disagreement, not a profitable edge. Upcoming games have no closing line yet, so the market number marked ~ is the consensus midpoint of the best posted spreads across books.